The Impact of Leadership Styles on School Performance: A Comparative Study of Educational Management Models

Authors

  • Jakoep Ezra Harianto STT LETS (Lighthouse Equipping Theological School), Gading Primar Hall, Klp. Gading Trade Centre, Jl. Pulau Putri No.Lt 2, Klp. Gading Bar., Kec. Klp. Gading, Jkt Utara, Daerah Khusus Ibu kota Jakarta 14240, Indonesia
  • Farhan Chaerul Umam Universitas Islam Cirebon, Komplek, Jl. Islamic Centre Jl. Tuparev No.111, Kertawinangun, Kec. Kedawung, Kabupaten Cirebon, Jawa Barat 45153, Indonesia
  • Fahmi Ginanjar Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Jl. Kapas No.9, Semaki, Kec. Umbulharjo, Kota Yogyakarta, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55166, Indonesia
  • Yasysyar Hidayat Universitas Negeri Makassar, Jl. A. P. Pettarani, Tidung, Kec. Rappocini, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan 90222, Indonesia
  • Abdul Muiz Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Jl. Laksda Adisucipto, Papringan, Caturtunggal, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71364/ijfsr.v2i3.23

Keywords:

Educational Leadership, School Performance, Transformational Leadership, Educational Management Models

Abstract

Leadership in educational institutions plays a crucial role in shaping school performance, teacher effectiveness, and student outcomes. Various leadership styles, including transformational, transactional, and instructional leadership, influence how schools develop strategies to improve academic achievements and institutional efficiency. However, the extent to which different leadership models contribute to educational success remains a subject of ongoing debate, necessitating a comparative analysis of educational management models. This study aims to examine the impact of different leadership styles on school performance by comparing key educational management models. The research explores how leadership behaviors, decision-making approaches, and organizational structures affect school effectiveness, faculty motivation, and student learning outcomes. Using a qualitative systematic literature review, this study analyzes peer-reviewed articles, case studies, and educational policy reports published in the last five years. A comparative thematic analysis was conducted to identify the strengths, weaknesses, and contextual applicability of various leadership models in different educational settings. The findings indicate that transformational leadership enhances teacher motivation, innovation, and collaborative school culture, leading to higher student engagement and institutional growth. Transactional leadership, while effective in goal-setting and accountability, tends to be less impactful in fostering long-term educational improvements. Meanwhile, instructional leadership, which focuses on curriculum development and pedagogical support, has shown strong correlations with improved teaching quality and student academic success. However, the effectiveness of these models is highly dependent on contextual factors, such as school resources, governance structures, and policy frameworks. The study highlights the need for integrated leadership approaches that combine transformational vision, structured management, and pedagogical expertise to optimize school performance. Future research should explore empirical case studies, cross-cultural leadership comparisons, and data-driven decision-making frameworks to refine educational leadership practices and develop more adaptable models for different institutional contexts.

Published

2025-03-15